Is it hay fever?
Dr Mike Townend examines the causes of allergic rhinitis and discusses how to confirm a diagnosis of hay fever and subsequently treat the condition
Allergic rhinitis is a syndrome consisting of inflammation and swelling of
the nasal mucosa, with variable degrees of nasal obstruction, hypersecretion of
mucus and sneezing, occurring on exposure to airborne allergens. It is often
associated with allergic conjunctivitis, and about 40 per cent of sufferers also
have or develop asthma1,2,3. When the syndrome occurs in response to
allergens derived from grass or grass pollen it is referred to as hay fever.
Hay fever is confined to the summer months when grass pollens become
airborne, usually occurring during the months of June, July and August, though
its precise time of onset depends on weather patterns, pollen counts in the
atmosphere being higher in warm, dry conditions. Its peak occurrence often
coincides with important academic examinations in the UK school calendar, with
potentially detrimental effects on academic performance.
| Key points Hay fever is a variety of allergic rhinitis and/or conjunctivitis, caused by allergy to grass pollen Diagnosis is not usually difficult as symptoms usually occur between June and August There may be concurrent allergy to other airborne allergens Skin testing is a safe way of demonstrating a reaction to the common airborne allergens and may be carried out in primary care Treatment with oral antihistamines and/or intranasal corticosteroids reduces nasal symptoms to an acceptable level in most patients Eye symptoms may respond to oral or intra-ocular antihistamines or to intra-ocular cromoglycate or nedocromil In severe, incapacitating hay fever, it may occasionally be necessary to resort to oral corticosteroids or depot corticosteroid injections |
Diagnosis
Hay fever is diagnosed principally from its
symptoms of nasal obstruction (running and sneezing) and/or red, itchy eyes, and
from its onset and duration in the summer months. Examination of the nose
confirms swelling of the mucosa, which often has a pale violet rather than a red
colour. If the eyes are affected the orbital conjuctiva is injected, often worse
in the angles but often widespread, and there may be a 'cobblestone' pattern on
the palpebral conjunctiva. Allergic conjunctivitis may also be distinguished
from the infective variety by the predominance of itching rather than grittiness
or soreness.
A history of rhinitis and/or conjunctivitis beginning in late spring
or early summer and lasting until mid to late summer is so characteristic that
skin testing is probably unnecessary in most cases. Some patients may have
co-existing symptoms due to other airborne allergens which may not be seasonal
and may confuse the diagnosis. There may also be co-existing asthma which may or
may not be seasonal.
Allergic rhinitis
Allergic rhinitis may be caused by other
common airborne allergens including those derived from house dust mites and
animals such as cats, dogs or horses. In such cases, symptoms are present at
other times in addition to the summer months and a history of exposure, for
example to domestic animals, may be obtained.
Other possible causes of allergic rhinitis which are not confined to
the summer may be found in occupational exposure to allergens (see Table 1) and
a careful occupational history should be taken. For workers exposed to these
allergens, allergic rhinitis is a 'prescribed industrial disease' and in some
cases industrial disability benefit may be payable.
It is possible that some patients may have a reaction to more than one
type of airborne allergen, and hay fever may then co-exist with dust, animal or
occupationally derived allergic rhinitis.
Vasomotor rhinitis is similar to allergic rhinitis in its symptoms but
persistent running of thin, clear mucus is often a predominant symptom. No clear
history of reaction to allergens is obtained but there may be a history of
symptoms on exposure to changes in environment such as atmospheric temperature
or on being exposed to direct sunlight.
Treatment
Antihistamine drugs have been shown to be
a safe and effective treatment for hay fever4, for both nasal and ocular
symptoms. Their effect, as may be expected, tends to be greater on the
immediate, histamine-related symptoms such as itching and sneezing than on nasal
obstruction. Older, sedative antihistamine drugs were often associated with
drowsiness, impairment of decision making and verbal learning and reduced
psychomotor skills5, though hay fever itself may also cause some of
these problems if untreated6. Newer, non-sedative antihistamines,
for example, acrivastine (Semprex), cetirizine (Zirtek), fexofenadine (Telfast),
loratadine (Clarityn), mizolastine (Mizollen), have been shown to be a safer
alternative and to reduce the sedation caused by the hay fever itself, a boon to
those sitting or reading for important examinations in the summer. Semprex and
Clarityn can also be used for children over two years old.
| Table 1: Recognised causes of occupational allergic rhinitis Isocyanates (used in printing & dyeing) Fumes or dust from hardening agents (eg epoxy resins) Fumes from soldering flux (rosin) Platinum salts Hardening agents e.g. those used with epoxy resins Proteolytic enzymes (used in manufacturing biological washing powders) Animals, insects etc used in laboratories Barley, oat, rye, wheat or maize dust or flour Antibiotics (particularly their manufacture) Cimetidine (particularly its manufacture) Wood dust Ispaghula (manufacture of bulk laxatives) Castor bean dust Ipecacuanha Azodicarbonamide Animals or insects or their larval forms used in pest control or fruit cultivation Glutaraldehyde Persulphate salts or henna Crustaceans or fish or their products (food processing) Reactive dyes Soya bean Tea dust l Green coffee bean dust Stainless steel welding fumes |
Intranasal corticosteroids
7 are often
extremely effective in reducing the symptoms of hay fever and are much more
effective than antihistamines in reducing nasal obstruction. They have an effect
on the immune system at virtually all levels of the 'inflammatory cascade'7
and have been shown to be superior to antihistamines in reducing all nasal
symptoms and in increasing the number of symptom-free days. There is no
statistically significant evidence of adrenal suppression from the use of
intranasal corticosteroids8. Although one study of growth in
children has suggested that there may be a reduction in short-term lower leg
growth9, there is no evidence that this can be extrapolated to a
significant reduction in final adult height. If symptoms are severe, initial use
of betamethasone nasal drops may be justified, but for longer-term treatment, it
is advisable to use a less well systemically absorbed corticosteroid such as
beclomethasone (for example Beconase) or mometasone (Nasonex).
Other nasal preparations for hay fever include sodium cromoglycate
(Rynacrom) and nedocromil (Tilarin)10_ mast cell stabilisers which
reduce the release of histamine from mast cells. They may be effective in
reducing nasal symptoms, particularly itching and sneezing. Levocabastine
(Livostin) is a potent antihistamine also available as an intranasal preparation
and may be more effective than sodium cromoglycate.
Oral corticosteroids are not justified for routine use in hay
fever, though a short high dose course of prednisolone for up to 1 or 2 weeks
(1-2 mg/kg/day for children under the age of 1 year, 20 mg/day from 1-5 years
and 30-40 mg/day for adults and older children) may be used for the initial
control of severe or disabling symptoms. Such a course of treatment is commonly
used in acute severe asthma. Maintenance treatment with 2.5-10 mg/day may be
used as a follow-on treatment until control is achieved by other means or for a
further limited period, for examle to cover the summer examination season in a
child whose severe symptoms may prejudice academic achievement.
Depot injectionsof corticosteroids such as triamcinolone
(Kenalog) and methylprednisolone (Depo-Medrone) may be used to treat both the
nasal and eye symptoms of hay fever11,12. Their effect lasts for
four weeks or more, and the injection may need to be repeated at least once in
order to maintain control throughout the hay fever season. The injection is more
effective given at the start of the season or early in it while the pollen count
is still increasing12.
The use of depot injections has
been shown to be more effective than intranasal steroids and to cause less
adrenal suppression than oral prednisolone 7.5 mg/day. There is little
information available on the possibility of suppression of growth in children
following the use of depot steroid injections for hay fever but it seems
unlikely that if treatment is confined to the short hay fever season that there
will be any significant retardation of growth. Depot steroids should be given by
deep intramuscular injection because surface leakage may lead to skin atrophy.
The use of depot steroid injections should be limited to patients with severe
symptoms which are difficult to control by other means, particularly if they are
at the stage of important academic examinations or other life crises. In such
patients an injection immediately prior to the start of the hay fever season and
repeated if necessary after four weeks may have a transforming effect on the
patient's life.
Treating the eyes. It is easy to overlook the
intense irritation which some hay fever sufferers experience in their eyes. Both
sodium cromoglycate (Opticrom)13 and nedocromil sodium (Rapitil) are
available as eye drops and are frequently effective. Levocabastine14
is an antihistamine which is available as eye drops and combines effectiveness
with a rapid onset of action
Mike Townend is a general practitioner in Cumbria and a member of the
British Travel Health Association
References
1 Rowe-Jones JM. The link between the nose
and lung, perennial rhinitis and asthma - is it the same disease? Allergy. 1997;
52 (36 Supplement): 20-8
2 Corren J. Allergic rhinitis and asthma: how
important is the link? J Allergy & Clinical Immunology. 1997; 99(2):
S781-6,
3 Grossman J. One airway, one disease. Chest. 1997; 111(2
Supplement): 11S-16S
4 Wood SF. Clinical experience with non-sedating
antihistamines in paediatric allergic rhinitis. Rhinology (Supplement)
1992; 13: 27-37
5 Nolen TM. Sedative effects of antihistamines: safety,
performance, learning and quality of life. Clinical Therapeutics. 1997;
19 (1): 39-55
6 Jones HS. Allergic rhinitis: a study on the prescribing
preferences in general practice. British J Clinical Practice. 1989; 43
(1): 30-2
7 Mygind N, Dahl R. The rationale for use of topical
corticosteroids in allergic rhinitis. Clinical & Experimental Allergy.
1996 (26 Supplement) 3: 2-10
8 Howland WC 3rd, Dockhorn R, Gillman S, Gross
GN, Hille D, Simpsom B, Furst JA, Feiss G, Smith JA. A comparison of effects of
triamcinolone acetonide aqueous nasal spray, oral prednisone and placebo on
adrenocortical function in male patients with allergic rhinitis. J Allergy &
Clinical Immunology. 1996; 98 (1): 32-8
9 Howland WC 3rd, Dockhorn R,
Gillman S, Gross GN, Hille D, Simpsom B, Furst JA, Feiss G, Smith JA. A
comparison of effects of triamcinolone acetonide aqueous nasal spray, oral
prednisone and placebo on adrenocortical function in male patients with allergic
rhinitis. J Allergy & Clinical Immunology. 1996; 98 (1): 32-8
10
Donnelly A, Casale TB. Nedocromil sodium is rapidly effective in the therapy of
seasonal allergic rhinitis. J Allergy & Clinical Immunology. 1993;
91 (5): 997-1004
11 Laursen LC, Faurschou P, Munch EP. Intramuscular
betamethasone dipropionate vs. topical beclomethasone dipropionate and placebo
in hay fever. Allergy. 1988; 43 (6): 420-4
12 Borum P, Gronborg H,
Mygind M. Seasonal allergic rhinitis and depot injection of a corticosteroid.
Evaluation of the efficacy of medication early and late in the season based on
detailed symptom recording. Allergy. 1987; 42 (1): 26-32
13 Leino
M, Montan P, Nja F. A double blind group comparative study of ophthalmic sodium
cromoglycate, 2% four times daily and 4% twice daily, in the treatment of
seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. Allergy. 1994; 49 (3): 147-51
14 Janssens MM, Vanden Bussche G. Levocabastine: an effective topical
treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Clinical & Experimental
Allergy. 1991; 21 Supplement 2: 29-36